New: Namelab.Try it free →

G2 Grid, Ratings, Reports and Awards: How G2 Ranking Works

Katya Rozenoer
Katya Rozenoer, Co-Founder & CEO of BlastraConnect with Katya on LinkedIn
· Updated

What G2 is, how the G2 Grid places products, how G2 ratings and scores are calculated, when Grid reports publish, and how G2 awards are chosen.

Update (February 2026): G2 has acquired Capterra, GetApp, and Software Advice, making it the dominant force in B2B software discovery. Understanding G2's ranking system is now more critical than ever.

Scoring change (2026): G2's Best Software Awards now require a minimum of 10 reviews from the prior calendar year, up from just 1 review in 2025. This raises the bar for awards eligibility.


G2 is a website where people who use business software rate it and write reviews, and where buyers go to compare products before they talk to a vendor. Its best-known output is the G2 Grid, a chart that places every qualifying product in a category according to two scores: Satisfaction, built from the ratings in users' reviews, and Market Presence, built from review volume and data about the company.

The ratings reviewers give feed that chart directly: the star rating comes from one question (how likely the reviewer is to recommend the product), while the answers on ease of use, quality of support and whether the product meets requirements make up the Satisfaction score. G2 publishes Grid reports once a season, four times a year, and once a year it names its Best Software Awards. This guide explains how each of those works and what a vendor can do to move up.

What Is G2?

G2 is a B2B software directory and peer-to-peer review platform where verified users share experiences with business software and services. G2 says it lists more than 200,000 products and services across more than 2,000 categories (source: G2 About), and it has published well over a million user reviews.

Many software websites display G2 badges like "Leader" or "High Performer" as a credibility signal for potential customers. Those badges, the quarterly reports and the annual awards all come from the same scoring system, which is why understanding it matters for any strategic directory presence in B2B software. At Blastra, we see that a strong, consistent presence across software directories significantly boosts how these badges convert during buying journeys.

How the G2 Grid Works

The G2 Grid plots the products in one category on two axes: Satisfaction (vertical) and Market Presence (horizontal). If your product is AI-native, note that G2 has created nearly 30 AI-specific categories since March 2025, many without Grid reports yet, where first movers can earn early placement. For a worked example of how a startup used early Grid placement to win a category, see our category creation playbook based on Profound. The Grid creates four distinct quadrants:

G2 Grid Report Example showing Leaders, High Performers, Contenders, and Niche quadrants
Example of G2 Grid Report showing the four quadrants. Source: G2.com
  • Leaders: High satisfaction + high market presence (top-right quadrant)
  • High Performers: High satisfaction + lower market presence (top-left quadrant)
  • Contenders: Lower satisfaction + high market presence (bottom-right quadrant)
  • Niche: Lower satisfaction + lower market presence (bottom-left quadrant)

We built a little game inspired by how software review grids work. Dodge bad reviews and push toward Made It:

BADGE SWEEPER

Navigate the grid. Dodge the bad reviews.

90sBEST: ---🚩 14

Click any cell in Ok to start. Right-click to flag. Long-press on mobile.

↑ USER LOVE
Ok
Seen
Loved
Made It
START HERE ↓
HOW KNOWN YOU ARE →

A category gets a Grid only when it has at least six products with 10 or more reviews each and 150 or more reviews overall, and a product appears on it only once it has at least 10 reviews in that category (source: G2 Research Scoring Methodologies). That threshold is why a young, narrow category is an easier place to earn a placement than a crowded one, a pattern we traced across four quarters of G2's Fall 2026 reports and the three before them.

How G2 Ratings and Scores Are Calculated

G2 turns reviews into three numbers that buyers see (source: G2 Research Scoring Methodologies):

  • Star rating. G2 takes each product's responses to the "Likely to Recommend" question, which reviewers answer on a 10-point scale, divides them in half and rounds up to the nearest half star.
  • Satisfaction score. Built from the rating questions in each review: Ease of Use, Meets Requirements and Quality of Support for users; Ease of Admin, Ease of Setup and Ease of Doing Business With for administrators; and Likelihood to Recommend and Direction of Product. Each review is weighted by its recency, quality and source.
  • Market Presence score. Built from the weighted number of reviews in the category, plus company data such as employee counts and revenue (from ZoomInfo, LinkedIn and Crunchbase) and web signals such as Moz authority and Similarweb traffic.

The G2 Score combines Satisfaction and Market Presence, and G2 category pages are sorted by it by default. It also decides:

  • Placement on G2's Grid reports
  • Ranking within software categories
  • Inclusion in quarterly market reports
  • Eligibility for G2 badges and awards that appear on company websites

Important Context: Scores are normalized from 0 to 100 within each category, so software competes against similar solutions rather than the entire G2 marketplace, and small differences in raw scores can look large once normalized.

G2 Grid Reports: The Quarterly Schedule and What Each Report Contains

G2 publishes its market reports seasonally, four times a year: Winter, Spring, Summer and Fall. Each season has a review deadline, and only reviews collected by that date count toward the season's reports. For the Winter 2027 reports, the review deadline is November 3, 2026 and the reports release on December 1, 2026. G2 posts each season's dates in its research agenda.

A season's release breaks every qualifying category into several report types (source: G2 Quarterly Reports):

  • Grid Reports: the overall category Grid described above, plus segment Grids for Small Business, Mid-Market and Enterprise buyers and Regional Grids for specific parts of the world.
  • Momentum Grid: highlights the products in a category that are growing fastest.
  • Index Reports: narrower rankings built from report-specific review questions. There are four: the Usability Index (how easy the software is to use), the Implementation Index (how smoothly deployment goes), the Results Index (how well the software delivers outcomes) and the Relationship Index (the quality of the vendor relationship). A category needs 150 or more reviews and at least six products with 10 or more reviews and five or more answers to those questions (source: G2 Research Scoring Methodologies).

The "Leader", "High Performer" and similar badges on vendor websites come from placements in these quarterly reports. Which badges exist, what each requires and what it costs to display them is covered in our G2 badges guide.

G2 Awards: The Best Software Awards

G2's Best Software Awards are a separate, annual program. G2 released its 2026 awards on February 18, 2026, across 46 lists, including Best Software Products, Best Global Software Companies, Fastest-Growing Products, Highest Satisfaction Products and Rookies of the Year (source: G2).

The awards differ from the quarterly badges in three ways:

  • They look back a full year. Only reviews from the prior calendar year, January 1 to December 31, count. The 2027 awards will be decided by reviews written in 2026.
  • The eligibility bar is per year. A product or company needs at least 10 reviews in that calendar year to be eligible, up from a single review for the 2025 awards (source: G2).
  • They rank across categories. A quarterly badge says where a product sits within one category; an award list combines a product's scores from every category it competes in, weights them by how competitive each category is, and ranks the results on Satisfaction and Market Presence.

The Two Pillars of G2 Scoring

Here's what feeds each half of your G2 Score at a glance, based on G2's published methodology (source: G2 Research Scoring Methodologies).

FactorSatisfactionMarket Presence
Review count in the category✓ (weights each review)High importance
Review recency✓ (newer reviews weigh more)✓ (via weighted review count)
Ease of Use, Meets Requirements, Quality of Support ratings✓No
Ease of Admin, Ease of Setup, Ease of Doing Business With ratings✓No
Likelihood to Recommend, Direction of Product✓No
Review quality and source✓ (weights each review)No
Company employee count (ZoomInfo, LinkedIn, Crunchbase)NoHigh to medium importance
Company revenue (ZoomInfo)NoMedium importance
Product page authority, search volume and trafficNoMedium to low importance
Domain authority, Similarweb metrics, Crunchbase rank, employee growth, year foundedNoLow importance

What this means in practice: reviews are the only input that moves both halves of your score. The rest of Satisfaction comes from the ratings inside those reviews, with thorough reviews from verified users weighted more heavily than brief ones; the rest of Presence comes from verifiable company and web data outside G2, where the weighted review count in your category is the single most important factor.

The Review Decay Factor: Time Works Against Everyone

Reviews lose influence over time through exponential decay, compounded daily (source: G2 Research Guidelines). Maintaining a steady flow of up-to-date directory content reinforces credibility even as older reviews decay — or you can outsource directory submissions and updates entirely.

  • 0-90 days: Decay begins immediately but is gentle — reviews still carry strong weight
  • First 18 months: Reviews maintain stronger weight during this period
  • After 18 months: Decay rate accelerates
  • After ~3 years: Reviews reach approximately 3% of original weight and maintain that floor indefinitely

Real-World Impact: A software company that generated 100 reviews through a campaign 18 months ago would find those reviews beginning to lose weight faster. Consistent monthly collection matters more than large one-time campaigns.

Strategic Priorities: What Actually Moves Scores

Certain activities have disproportionate impact on scoring:

Highest Priority Actions

  1. Consistent Review Generation: Establishing ongoing collection processes rather than one-time campaigns (see our G2 and Capterra Reviews guide)
  2. Recent Review Focus: Maximizing reviews within the critical 90-day window
  3. Review Quality Enhancement: Encouraging detailed, thoughtful responses over brief comments
  4. Organic Collection: Non-incentivized reviews receive bonus weighting in the algorithm
  5. Category Accuracy: Ensuring reviews are properly attributed to relevant software categories
  6. Company Data Maintenance: Keeping third-party profiles (LinkedIn, Crunchbase) current

Secondary Priority Actions

  1. Customer Segment Diversification: Collecting reviews across company sizes (small business, mid-market, enterprise)
  2. User Experience Optimization: Addressing friction points affecting ease-of-use scores
  3. Review Engagement: Responding to both positive and negative feedback
  4. Multi-Category Strategy: Optimizing for each relevant software category

Removed or Reduced Scoring Factors

  1. Twitter/X Metrics: Eliminated from scoring (October 2024)
  2. Glassdoor Integration: Removed from Market Presence calculations (October 2024)
  3. Social Media Following: Reduced in importance — online presence and third-party data sources carry more weight

Common Pitfalls That Sabotage Success

Review Attribution Failures: G2 excludes reviews from users marked as "business partners," but the definition question often confuses customers. This can result in "silent failures" where reviews are collected but don't impact scoring.

Category Misattribution: Reviews get assigned to categories based on customer responses during submission. Software serving multiple categories must guide customers through these questions to ensure proper attribution. For an example of how an enterprise SaaS company manages its G2 presence around a category mismatch, see our teardown of Miro's review site strategy — the messaging is repositioning toward AI, but the categories that drive discovery still classify Miro as a whiteboard tool.

Campaign Dependency: Many companies run single review campaigns and experience score drops over time due to decay. Sustainable success requires consistent, ongoing collection.

Incentive Over-Reliance: While incentivized reviews help with volume, organic reviews carry algorithmic advantages. The most effective strategies balance both approaches.

Free vs. Paid G2 Accounts: Scoring Reality

G2's scoring algorithm treats free and paid accounts identically. The methodology documentation is available to all vendors regardless of account type, and no scoring advantages come with paid subscriptions.

Paid Account Benefits:

  • Detailed analytics and competitor benchmarking
  • Advanced review management capabilities
  • Licensed report access for marketing use
  • Preview access to draft reports
  • Enhanced profile customization options

Paid Account Limitations:

  • No scoring algorithm advantages
  • No review weighting benefits
  • No ranking preference in results

Companies can start with free accounts while focusing on fundamental scoring factors, upgrading later when advanced tools become necessary rather than for competitive advantages. G2 is also one of several places buyers and AI tools check, so it is worth building presence on other B2B software review sites in parallel.

Implementation Framework: A 90-Day Approach

Weeks 1-2: Assessment

  • Audit current G2 presence and scoring
  • Map primary categories and competitive landscape
  • Establish baseline metrics and tracking
  • If you're centralizing multiple directory listings, choosing the right operational plan is essential — our pricing outlines the workflows most teams rely on

Weeks 3-6: Foundation Building

  • Launch systematic customer review outreach
  • Update external data sources (LinkedIn, Crunchbase)
  • Begin review response strategy

Weeks 7-12: Optimization

  • Implement sustainable review collection processes, including the review link in the company email signature, which a signature manager keeps current as priorities shift
  • Segment outreach by customer characteristics and categories
  • Monitor scoring changes and adjust tactics

Ongoing Operations:

  • Monthly review collection activities
  • Quarterly competitive analysis and scoring review
  • Annual strategy assessment and category optimization

Key Success Patterns

Software companies that achieve top G2 positions maintain consistent review collection rather than sporadic campaigns, focus on genuine customer satisfaction over algorithm manipulation, and treat G2 success as ongoing rather than one-time effort.

Companies in "Leader" quadrants report using their G2 status throughout sales processes, while those in "High Performer" positions use their customer satisfaction strength. Even "Niche" positioning can be valuable when properly contextualized for specific market segments.

Sources

This analysis is based on publicly available G2 documentation:

Based on G2's publicly available documentation. G2 may update its ranking methodology; verify against official sources for current requirements.


FAQ: Answers to Common Questions

What factors influence a product's ranking on the G2 Grid?

Two scores drive Grid position. Satisfaction is built from the ratings in reviews (ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin and setup, likelihood to recommend), with each review weighted by recency, quality and source. Market Presence combines the weighted review count in the category with company employee count, revenue and web presence data. The weighted review count is the most important Market Presence factor.

How does the G2 Grid work, and what affects a product's ranking?

The Grid is a two-axis chart — Market Satisfaction (vertical) × Market Presence (horizontal) — that plots products within a category into four quadrants: Leaders (high on both), High Performers (high satisfaction, lower presence), Contenders (high presence, lower satisfaction), and Niche (lower on both). Your quadrant position is relative to other products in your category, not to the entire G2 marketplace. Scores are normalized per category. The Grid is published quarterly and requires a category to have at least 6 products with 10+ reviews each, and 150+ total category reviews.

What determines placement in the Leader quadrant vs. High Performer?

Both quadrants require high Market Satisfaction — the difference is Market Presence. Leaders have high satisfaction and high presence (strong review velocity, larger company signals, broader online footprint). High Performers have high satisfaction but lower presence — often newer or more focused products with strong customer love but not yet the volume or company-scale signals of category Leaders.

How does G2 create new categories?

G2 creates and updates categories in response to market signals — user search behavior, vendor taxonomy requests, analyst coverage, and emerging product patterns. Since March 2025, G2 has added nearly 30 AI-specific categories; many of those don't yet have Grid reports, which creates an opening for early movers to establish position before the category fills in. For the mechanics of how AI categories specifically are formed and what they mean for vendors, see our G2 AI categories guide.

How many reviews do I need to appear on G2 Grid reports?

10+ recent reviews minimum for meaningful visibility. Grid reports require categories with 6+ products having 10+ reviews each and 150+ total reviews. More reviews increase your Market Presence score.

Do paid G2 accounts get better rankings?

No. G2's algorithm treats free and paid accounts identically. Paid accounts offer analytics and enhanced profiles — no scoring advantages. Focus on reviews first.

How quickly do reviews lose their impact?

Reviews decay gradually for the first 90 days and keep a stronger weight for the first 18 months. After that, decay accelerates, and after about three years a review settles at roughly 3% of its original weight, where it stays. Consistent collection beats one-time campaigns.

What's more important: review quantity or quality?

Quality has outsized impact. Detailed reviews from verified users receive higher weighting. Organic (non-incentivized) reviews get algorithmic bonuses. Prioritize substantive reviews over volume.

Can I incentivize customers to leave reviews?

Yes, through official programs — G2 paid campaigns, Capterra gift cards up to $25. Incentives must be for reviewing, not positive sentiment. Organic reviews receive algorithmic advantages, so balance both approaches.


Disclaimer: This article provides educational analysis of publicly available G2 methodology documentation. This content is not sponsored, endorsed, or affiliated with G2.com, Inc. G2®, G2 Grid®, and related trademarks are the property of G2.com, Inc.


Want to get listed on top software directories?

Blastra automates the submission process and listings management for B2B software companies

Updated October 4, 2026: Corrected how review decay works to match G2's methodology (an 18-month curve that settles at a 3% floor; the FAQ previously gave a 90-day / 12-month / 24-month schedule) and removed claims G2's methodology does not support: a '(Satisfaction + Market Presence) / 2' formula with a 50/50 split, '15 factors', a 1-10 scale, a ~30%-per-year decay rate, and an unsourced 49% buyer statistic.

Spotted a mistake? Let us know at support@blastra.io.

Cookies on BlastraWe use cookies to run the site and understand how it's used. They're on by default — you can opt out below or change your choices anytime. See our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.